hi everyone,

it's long time i hv written something. for a change iam posting an interesting story. pl read n respond.

Yet another theory on 9/11.
>    
> You must have read the earlier theory that.....
>
> The TWIN TOWERS were NOT brought down by the 2
> planes
> only.
>
> Also that there was no plane involved in the
> Pentagon
> attack...but a missile
> probably !!
>
> NOW READ THIS !!!!!!!!
>
> Reading this makes you wonder how very much true and
> linked is the earlier theory by some research
> students
> in US as to how it was not possible for this to
> happen
> only by the crashing of airplanes.
>
> You've got to be lucky to make $4 Billion killing on
> a
> 6-month investment of $124 Million
>
> Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon
> who
> purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior
> to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its
> 33-year history the complex had EVER changed
> ownership.
>
> Mr. Silverstein's first order of business as the new
> owner was to change the company responsible for the
> security of the complex. The new security
> company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec).
> George
> W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of
> directors , and Marvin's cousin, Wirt Walker III,
> was
> its CEO.
>
> According to public records, not only did Securacom
> provide electronic security for the World Trade
> Center
> , it also covered Dulles International Airport and
> United Airlines THE two key players in the
> 9/11 attacks.
> The company was backed by an investment firm, the
> Kuwait-American Corp.,also linked for many years to
> the Bush family. KuwAm has been linked to the
> Bush family since the Gulf War.
> One of its principals and a member of the Kuwaiti
> royal family, Mishal Yousef Saud al Sabah, served on
> the board of Stratesec.
>
> Now, consider:
>
> The members of a small cabal owned the WTC complex,
> controlled its electronic security, and also
> controlled the security not only for one of
> the airlines whose aircraft were hijacked on 9/11,
> but
> the airport from which they originated.
>
> Another little "coincidence " -- Mr. Silversten, who
> made a down-payment of $124 million on this $3.2
> billion complex, promptly insured it for $7
> billion .
> Not only that, he covered the complex against
> "terrorist attacks".
>
> Following the attacks, Silverstein filed TWO
> insurance
> claims for the maximum amount of the policy ($7B),
> based on the two -- in Silverstein's
> view -- separate attacks.
> The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr.
> Silverstein $4.6 Billion!!..... a princely return on
> a
> relatively paltry investment of $124 million.
>
> There 's more.
> You see, the World Trade Towers were not the real
> estate plum we are led to believe. From an economic
> standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since
> its inception by the NY Port Authority -- has never
> functioned, nor was it intended to function,
> unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate
> marketplace.
>
> How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of
> this? The towers required some $200 million in
> renovations and improvements, most of which
> related to removal and replacement of building
> materials declared to be health hazards in the years
> since the towers were built. It was well-known
> by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos
> bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the
> building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on
> several
> occasions to get permits to demolish the
> building for liability reasons, but being turned
> down
> due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was
> well-known the only reason the building was still
> standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to
> disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the
> Port Authority was prohibited legally from
> demolishing
> the buildings.
> The projected cost to disassemble the towers: $15
> Billion. Just the scaffolding for the operation was
> estimated at $2.4 Billion!
> In other words, the Twin Towers were condemned
> structures. How convenient that an unexpected
> "terrorist" attack demolished the buildings
> completely.
>
> WTC Building 7 was a part of the WTC complex, and
> covered under the same insurance policy. This
> 47-storey steel-framed structure, which was
> NOTstruckby an aircraft, mysteriously
> collapsed 8 hours later that same day into its own
> footprint at freefall speed - exactly in the manner
> of
> the Twin Towers .
> How could this have happened?
>
> Mr. Silverstein gave the world the answer when he
> slipped up during a PBS television interview a year
> later , on 9/11/2002:
> "I remember getting a call from the...er...fire
> department commander, telling me that they were not
> sure they were gonna be able to contain the
> fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of
> life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.
> ' And they made that decision to pull and we watched
> the building collapse."
> As anyone who knows anything about construction can
> tell you, "Pull" is common industry jargon for a
> controlled demolition.
>
> One thing is for sure, the decision to 'pull' WTC 7
> would have delighted many people. Especially
> because it has been reported that thousands of
> sensitive files relating to some of the biggest
> financial scams in history � including Enron and
> WorldCom -- were stored in the offices of some of
> the
> building's tenants: � US Secret Service � NSA
> �
> CIA � IRS � BATF � SEC � NAIC Securities �
> Salomon Smith Barney � American Express Bank
> International � Standard Chartered Bank �
> Provident Financial Management �
> ITT Hartford Insurance Group � Federal Home Loan
> Bank.
> The Securities and Exchange Commission has not
> quantified the number of active cases in which
> substantial files were destroyed by the collapse
> of WTC 7.
> Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times
> published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000.
> They include the agency's major inquiry into the
> manner in which investment banks divvied up hot
> shares
> of initial public offerings during the high-tech
> boom.
> ..."Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will
> be
> dramatically affected because so much of their work
> is
> paper-intensive," said Max Berger of New York 's
> Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. "This is a
> disaster for these
> cases."
> Citigroup says some information that the committee
> is
> seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept.
> 11
> terror attack on the World Trade Center .
> Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center. The
> bank
> says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from
> September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at
> the building and destroyed in the attack.
>
> Inside WTC 7 was the US Secret Service's largest
> field
> office with more than 200 employees. "All the
> evidence
> that we stored at 7 World Trade,
> in all our cases, went down with the building,"
> according to US Secret Service Special Agent David
> Curran.
>
> What a neat, complete, and fortuitous turn of events
> was 9/11.
> Incidentally, it's worth noting that one of Lucky
> Larry's closest friends...
> a person with whom it's said he speaks almost daily
> by
> phone ... is none other than former Israeli Prime
> Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. More on that
> cozy little relationship later...